CryptoCoinsInfoClub.com

Bitcoin Transactions Per Second

The Battle For Bitcoin: What You Need To Know About Bitcoin And Bitcoin Cash

The Battle For Bitcoin: What You Need To Know About Bitcoin And Bitcoin Cash

The Battle For Bitcoin: What You Need To Know About Bitcoin And Bitcoin Cash Bitcoin has been caught up in a protracted scaling debate since early 2015, when the first solutions were proposed by Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen and Mike Hearn, all well known and respected bitcoin core developers at the time. Each of these proposed changes revolved around a quick increase to the blocksize, the individual blocks that make up the blockchain, and a corresponding non-backwards compatible upgrade of the protocol known as a hard fork. A significant number of the other respected developers, who have since evolved to be the leading voices of the current Bitcoin developer community, disagreed with the need to scale via the blocksize and a hard fork. This group would later propose Segregated Witness, typically shortened to SegWit, an upgrade that would enable more sophisticated scalability methods that have been proposed but have yet to be implemented. Segwit was memorialized as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal #141 in late December of 2015. There has been a two year controversy over which type of scaling solution would succeed. During this time, original core contributor Mike Hearn, tired of the stalemate, publicly declared Bitcoin dead and moved on. User Activated Soft Fork Hat Users Wear In Support In 2017 users banded together to activate a soft fork, which is a backwards compatible upgrade, known as UASF, activating SegWit. The mining community, which was the main force blocking the upgrade to BIP 141, responded with their own user activated hard fork, or UAHF, to enable a blocksize increase as the main scaling method. Thus, we now have Bitcoin (BTC) from the UASF blockchain and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) from the UAHF blockchain. As an entrepreneur looking into the industry, here is what yo Continue reading >>

Bitcoin And Ethereum Vs Visa And Paypal Transactions Per Second

Bitcoin And Ethereum Vs Visa And Paypal Transactions Per Second

Bitcoin and Ethereum vs Visa and PayPal Transactions per second One of the big debates happening in the Bitcoin community is over the specification of block sizes, which limits the maximum number of transactions that may be processed per second. Luno, a Bitcoin exchange and wallet provider, recently explained that transacting in Bitcoin has become painfully slow. It is also much more expensive than it was a few years ago. Atheoretical maximum speed for Bitcoin that has been circulating online is seven transactions per second. However, in reality the Bitcoin network is achieving maximums of 3 to 4 transactions per second. This seems low, and raises the question: How does Bitcoins maximum transaction capacity compare to the likes of Visa, PayPal, and cryptocurrency Ethereum? A few solutions have been proposed for the Bitcoin block size issue. One is Bitcoin Unlimited, which proposes removing the block size limit. Another is Segregated Witness, which proposes doubling the block size. There is no consensus in the Bitcoin community on which direction to take as yet, with support for Bitcoin Unlimited at around 36% and support for SegWit at around 27%. Support is measured as a percentage of the total Bitcoin mined over a specific period, with several miners not indicating explicit support for either of the two proposals. Towards the end of 2016, ETHNews reported that Ethereum had an estimated speed limit of around 20 transactions per second. A system called Raiden is in development that will use Ethereum smart contracts to increase the maximum speed to as high as one million transactions per second. The first version of Raiden was due out by the end of March , butthere have been no newupdates from the team since February. PayPal 193 transactions per second average PayPal han Continue reading >>

Transactions Speeds: How Do Cryptocurrencies Stack Up To Visa Or Paypal?

Transactions Speeds: How Do Cryptocurrencies Stack Up To Visa Or Paypal?

Transactions Speeds: How Do Cryptocurrencies Stack Up To Visa or PayPal? Transactions Speeds: How Do Cryptocurrencies Stack Up To Visa or PayPal? Cryptocurrency bag holders often boast that their network transaction speeds are faster than mainstream payment methods, such as Visa or Paypal. As cryptocurrencies continue to rise in popularity, it will be important to determine which blockchain payment networks could eventually become the new Visa. While both sides continue to debate their arguments, we jumped through the hard data and created a unique visual to highlight transaction speeds across several different payment networks. We chose to compare the transaction speeds of some of the largest cryptocurrencies by market-cap relative to Visa and PayPal. Each payment network is ranked largest-to-smallest based on the size of their balloon, which equates to the number of transactions per second. The larger the balloon, the more transactions their payment network can process per second. This allows for a clear and concise visual to show once and for all how some of the most popular crytpocurrencies stack up to more traditional payment methods. Ripple Shows Potential, But Visa is Still the King of Speed As you can see, Visa still has the fastest transaction speeds over any other payment networks measured, with 24,000 transactions per second. It was surprising to see Ripple come in second and beat out PayPal by a whopping 1,307 transactions per second. This shows that Ripple may have the capability to be a viable payment solution on a much larger scale. PayPal had 218 million active users during the third quarter of 2017. PayPal is still among the most popular and well-known digital peer-to-peer platforms out there, but Ripples transaction speed dominance could be the key to Continue reading >>

Bitcoin And Ethereum Vs Visa And Paypal Transactions Per Second

Bitcoin And Ethereum Vs Visa And Paypal Transactions Per Second

Bitcoin and Ethereum vs Visa and PayPal Transactions per second One of the big debates happening in the Bitcoin community is over the specification of block sizes, which limits the maximum number of transactions that may be processed per second. Luno, a Bitcoin exchange and wallet provider, recently explained that transacting in Bitcoin has become painfully slow. It is also much more expensive than it was a few years ago. Atheoretical maximum speed for Bitcoin that has been circulating online is seven transactions per second. However, in reality the Bitcoin network is achieving maximums of 3 to 4 transactions per second. This seems low, and raises the question: How does Bitcoins maximum transaction capacity compare to the likes of Visa, PayPal, and cryptocurrency Ethereum? A few solutions have been proposed for the Bitcoin block size issue. One is Bitcoin Unlimited, which proposes removing the block size limit. Another is Segregated Witness, which proposes doubling the block size. There is no consensus in the Bitcoin community on which direction to take as yet, with support for Bitcoin Unlimited at around 36% and support for SegWit at around 27%. Support is measured as a percentage of the total Bitcoin mined over a specific period, with several miners not indicating explicit support for either of the two proposals. Towards the end of 2016, ETHNews reported that Ethereum had an estimated speed limit of around 20 transactions per second. A system called Raiden is in development that will use Ethereum smart contracts to increase the maximum speed to as high as one million transactions per second. The first version of Raiden was due out by the end of March , butthere have been no newupdates from the team since February. PayPal 193 transactions per second average PayPal han Continue reading >>

Bitcoin Transactions Pick Up Speed, Energy Use Through The Roof

Bitcoin Transactions Pick Up Speed, Energy Use Through The Roof

Bitcoin Transactions Pick Up Speed, Energy Use Through the Roof The network overload of the past months suddenly resolved, while trading volumes also dwindled. Bitcoin's network has been clogged for months, especially during large price swings, when traders tried to move BTC onto exchanges, or buy immediately as the price rose. But now, the speed of Bitcoin has risen to 21 transactions per second. Bitcoin Sliding to $900? Expert Predicts Dot-Com Bubble Scenario The backlog has shrank from a peak near 300,000 unverified transactions to as low as 4,100 pending transfers. In the past days, the transaction backlogs gradually cleared as the price of BTC sank below $9,000. Some believed the exceptionally high volumes were deliberate spam to the network, or possibly traffic from Coinbase because of heightened buying interest. The average transaction has fallen from the peak levels to about $3.20 per transaction - still steep compared to 2015 levels, but more reasonable compared to the $100 fees incurred by wallets, or even higher payments to miners. The high network speed at the moment comes at a cost. In the past three months, the energy for Bitcoin has doubled. A single transaction now takes about 634 KWh of energy, shows the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index . Bitcoin now consumes a small, but noticeable 0.22% of worldwide electricity. Bitcoin mining converts electricity into trustless financial reliability. Tuur Demeester (@TuurDemeester) February 12, 2018 According to statistics, one Bitcoin transaction now uses the same energy as 100,000 VISA transactions. For the environmentally conscious, the carbon footprint of BTC is rather high, estimated at 310.53 kg of CO2 per transaction. The carbon footprint is based on an estimate, given that most Bitcoin mining happens in Chin Continue reading >>

Bitcoin Fees Are Skyrocketing

Bitcoin Fees Are Skyrocketing

Bitcoin network has struggled to process more than four transactions per second. by Timothy B. Lee - Dec 11, 2017 3:42 pm UTC Rising demand has caused Bitcoin's transaction fees to skyrocket. Timothy B. Lee, using data from Blockchain.info The cost to complete a Bitcoin transaction has skyrocketed in recent days. A week ago, it cost around $6 on average to get a transaction accepted by the Bitcoin network. The average fee soared to $26 on Friday and was still almost $20 on Sunday. The reason is simple: until recently, the Bitcoin network had a hard-coded 1 megabyte limit on the size of blocks on the blockchain, Bitcoin's shared transaction ledger. With a typical transaction size of around 500 bytes, the average block had fewer than 2,000 transactions. And with a block being generated once every 10 minutes, that works out to around 3.3 transactions per second. A September upgrade called segregated witness allowed the cryptographic signatures associated with each transaction to be stored separately from the rest of the transaction. Under this scheme, the signatures no longer counted against the 1 megabyte blocksize limit, which should have roughly doubled the network's capacity. But only a small minority of transactions have taken advantage of this option so far, so the network's average throughput has stayed below 2,500 transactions per blockaround four transactions per second. Bitcoin has a transaction fee system to handle situations where demand for the network exceeds its capacity. Whenever someone submits a transaction to the network, they have the option to include a transaction fee that goes to whichever miner includes that transaction in a block. If there are more transactions than will fit into one block, miners can be expected to choose the transactions with th Continue reading >>

Bitcoin Scalability Problem

Bitcoin Scalability Problem

For a broader coverage related to this topic, see Bitcoin . The bitcoin scalability problem exists because of the limits of the maximum amount of transactions the bitcoin network can process. It is a consequence of the fact that blocks in the blockchain are limited to one megabyte in size. [1] Bitcoin blocks carry the transactions on the bitcoin network since the last block has been created. [2] :ch. 2 In contrast to Visa's peak of 47,000 transactions per second, [3] the bitcoin network's theoretical maximum capacity sits between 3.3 to 7 transactions per second. [4] [5] The one-megabyte limit has created a bottleneck in bitcoin, resulting in increasing transaction fees and delayed processing of transactions that cannot be fit into a block. [6] Various proposals have come forth on how to scale bitcoin, and a contentious debate has resulted. Business Insider in 2017 characterized this debate as an "ideological battle over bitcoin's future." [7] On 21 July 2017 bitcoin miners locked-in a software upgrade referred to as Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 91, meaning that the controversial Segregated Witness upgrade activated at block 477,120. [8] A fork (referring to a blockchain) is what occurs when a blockchain splits into two paths moving forward. Forks on the bitcoin network regularly occur as part of the mining process. They happen when two miners find a block at a similar point in time. As a result, the network briefly forks. This fork is subsequently resolved by the software which automatically chooses the longest chain, thereby orphaning the extra blocks added to the shorter chain (that were dropped by the longer chain). A blockchain can also fork when developers change rules in the software used to determine which transactions are valid. [9] As per CoinDesk , a h Continue reading >>

Transactions Per Second : Bitcoin

Transactions Per Second : Bitcoin

Do not use URL shortening services: always submit the real link. Begging/asking for bitcoins is absolutely not allowed, no matter how badly you need the bitcoins. Only requests for donations to large, recognized charities are allowed, and only if there is good reason to believe that the person accepting bitcoins on behalf of the charity is trustworthy. News articles that do not contain the word "Bitcoin" are usually off-topic. This subreddit is not about general financial news. Submissions that are mostly about some other cryptocurrency belong elsewhere. For example, /r/CryptoCurrency is a good place to discuss all cryptocurrencies. Promotion of client software which attempts to alter the Bitcoin protocol without overwhelming consensus is not permitted. Trades should usually not be advertised here. For example, submissions like "Buying 100 BTC" or "Selling my computer for bitcoins" do not belong here. /r/Bitcoin is primarily for news and discussion. Please avoid repetition /r/bitcoin is a subreddit devoted to new information and discussion about Bitcoin and its ecosystem. New merchants are welcome to announce their services for Bitcoin, but after those have been announced they are no longer news and should not be re-posted. Aside from new merchant announcements, those interested in advertising to our audience should consider Reddit's self-serve advertising system . Do not post your Bitcoin address unless someone explicitly asks you to. Be aware that Twitter, etc. is full of impersonation. Continue reading >>

7 Misunderstandings Of Bitcoins Scalingproblem

7 Misunderstandings Of Bitcoins Scalingproblem

7 Misunderstandings of Bitcoins ScalingProblem I did, for quite some time, fail to see the real scaling hurdle that faces Bitcoin. It was all about the blocksize and how many transactions we could get on-chain. Blocksize just jumps out at you, before anything else, as the obvious and most direct corollary to how much we can accomplish with the blockchain. So how could someone argue that such a thing may be one of the least important parameters for Bitcoins success? Being a very early adopter of this technology Ive gotten used to it operating a certain way. Ive become comfortable with what a transaction is, how long I have to wait, and am generally familiar with all of the software and means of interaction. Someone coming along and saying my interaction with it is going to have to change throws up a red flag for me. And it did, when I first heard the suggestion that blocks should be kept small. How the hell am I supposed to buy stuff on NewEgg or Amazon if transaction fees are high? Bitcoin becomes unusable doesnt it? So, whenever I get worried, nervous, or unsure of what comes next, I read. I consume anything and everything I can get my digital hands on. I promise you I have consumed and assessed nearly every possible argument for and against a blocksize increase, as is easily discoverable on the internet. And after hundreds of nuanced, fascinating, heavy-handed, belligerent, thought-provoking, or outright idiotic arguments, I have firmly come down on the side of keeping the blocksize as small as we can manage. Before you get angry and start deciding the reasons why Im stupid (or which bank is funding my article), just hear me out. During my journey from infinite blocksize to maybe we can get away with no direct blocksize increase at all, I went through a series of cri Continue reading >>

3 Cryptocurrencies Processing 1,500 (or More) Transactions Per Second

3 Cryptocurrencies Processing 1,500 (or More) Transactions Per Second

3 Cryptocurrencies Processing 1,500 (or More) Transactions Per Second These digital currencies have a need for speed when it comes to processing and settling transactions. Over the past year and change, there simply hasn't been a more impressive asset class than cryptocurrencies. In just over one year's time, the aggregate value of every single virtual currency added up catapulted from less than $18 billion to $835 billion. Yes, this includes new coins that entered the market, but it also demonstrates just how rapidly cryptocurrency valuations exploded higher. With nearly 1,500 cryptocurrencies now listed, the market is getting crowded. What's more, the proprietary blockchain technology that's fueled this rally in alt-coins is getting tougher to differentiate. For those unfamiliar, blockchain is the digital, distributed, and decentralized ledger that underpins virtual currencies and is responsible for logging all transactions without the need for a financial intermediary, which is often a bank. These cryptocurrencies are among the quickest at processing transactions Though there are a lot of factors that should be taken into account when differentiating one proprietary blockchain from another, transaction speed per second certainly comes into play. Understandably, transactions per second isn't an all-encompassing measure, since few, if any, sources have examined hundreds of cryptocurrencies side by side under similar stress simulations. In addition, transactions per second fails to take into account block resolution times, which do matter. Nevertheless, a fast processing time is bound to turn heads for investors and potential enterprise customers. Surprisingly, the two most popular networks are notoriously slow, all things considered. According to a recent analysis fro Continue reading >>

Scalability - Bitcoin Wiki

Scalability - Bitcoin Wiki

[Note: This page is seriously outdated and largely unmaintained; due to past incidents of edit-warring it has not been subject to much peer review.] A Bitcoin full node could be modified to scale to much higher transaction rates than are seen today, assuming that said node is running on a high end servers rather than a desktop. Bitcoin was designed to support lightweight clients that only process small parts of the block chain (see simplified payment verification below for more details on this). Please note that this page exists to give calculations about the scalability of a Bitcoin full node and transactions on the block chain without regards to network security and decentralization. It is not intended to discuss the scalability of alternative protocols or try and summarise philosophical debates. Create alternative pages if you want to do that. When techies hear about how bitcoin works they frequently stop at the word "flooding" and say "Oh-my-god! that can't scale!". The purpose of this article is to take an extreme example, the peak transaction rate of Visa, and show that bitcoin could technically reach that kind of rate without any kind of questionable reasoning, changes in the core design, or non-existent overlays. As such, it's merely an extreme example not a plan for how bitcoin will grow to address wider needs (as a decentralized system it is the bitcoin using public who will decide how bitcoin grows) it's just an argument that shows that bitcoin's core design can scale much better than an intelligent person might guess at first. Dan rightly criticizes the analysis presented here pointing out that operating at this scale would significantly reduce the decentralized nature of bitcoin: If you have to have many terabytes of disk space to run a "full validating" n Continue reading >>

Bitcoin Speed: 7 Transactions Per Second?

Bitcoin Speed: 7 Transactions Per Second?

transactions bitcoin-core bitcoincore-development I read somewhere that Bitcoin can only handle 7 transactions per second. This works out to 604,800 transactions per day. Visa currently processes about 1,700 transactions per second (and can handle vastly higher amounts than this). This means that the Bitcoin system can handle less than 1/200 of Visa's current processing output. Is this correct? I find it hard to believe that so many people would buy into a system that's so inefficient / unscalable. Also, if my assumption is correct, suppose there are (on avg) 700 transactions per second during a given 10 min period (i.e, 70 times the max output rate) does this mean we will need to wait 70 * 10 min for all those transactions to be confirmed? If yes, why can't some evil actor overwhelm (i.e, postpone) the system by submitting thousands of tiny transactions to the network? I don't know where you got a rate for Visa of 1,700. Visa's own site says 24,000 per second. abelenky Jan 29 at 16:01 I read somewhere that Bitcoin can only handle 7 transactions per second. That's roughly correct - only about 7 transactions per second can be confirmed using legacy transactions. With the recent adoption of segregated witness, it could be closer to 30 transactions per second. I find it hard to believe that so many people would buy into a system that's so inefficient / unscalable. Some people might have confidence that a better solution will eventually be found. The protocol can be changed with community consensus. Others might find that it is good enough for what they need in the short term (a particular transaction, day trading, etc) and not care what happens in the long term. Also, if my assumption is correct, suppose there are (on avg) 700 transactions per second during a given 10 min Continue reading >>

A Blockchain That Handles Millions Of Transactions Per Second?

A Blockchain That Handles Millions Of Transactions Per Second?

A Blockchain that Handles Millions of Transactions per Second? December 22, 2017, 10:12:31 AM EDT By David Floyd Anyone who tried to send some bitcoin over the past few days and found themselves paying a fee of $20 or moreonly to wait hours for the transaction to confirmknows about blockchains' scalability issues. Bitcoin cash was forked from the main chain to try to speed things up a bit, but the 30-something transactions per second the new cryptocurrency could reasonably process pale in comparison to Visa's 50-something thousand. Which is why, if Kochava founder and CEO Charles Manning is right, the product his company is building could attract a lot of attention in blockchainland. He expects XCHNG, a smart contract platform Kochava hopes will disrupt the digital advertising industry, to process millions of transactions per second. "Yeah, millions, exactly," Manning told me on a phone call last week, in response to an incredulous request that he repeat the number. "That's what's amazing to me, is that financial services folks often point to their transaction volumes and say, well it really needs to beef up. If you want an example of a very difficult, high-volume ecosystem, it's adtech. Think of every impression as a trade." Processing a transaction in 45 or 50 milliseconds is nothing new for the industry or for Kochava, a six-year old company that, until around two-and-a-half years ago, had nothing to do with blockchain. Maintaining that kind of speed when moving from a centralized model to a decentralized one, though, has so far defied solution. To be sure, XCHNGwhich Manning expects to go live at the beginning of 2019does not rely on proof of work, which would probably preclude even speeds a few orders of magnitude slower than Kochava aims for. XCHNG is its own ani Continue reading >>

'7 Million Transactions A Second' Research Paper Declares 1tb Blocks Feasible - Bitcoin News

'7 Million Transactions A Second' Research Paper Declares 1tb Blocks Feasible - Bitcoin News

7 Million Transactions a Second Research Paper Declares 1TB Blocks Feasible This week a research paper was published by the founder of Lokad, a quantitative supply chain software company, and it details how terabyte blocks (TB) implemented into the bitcoin cash (BCH) blockchain could be feasible both technically and economically. Research Paper Describes How Terabyte Blocks Could be Applied to the Bitcoin Cash Network On Sunday, December 17 the researcher and founder of Lokad, Joannes Vermorel, published a paper called Terabyte Blocks for Bitcoin Cash. Vermorel argues that the original Bitcoin whitepaper describes a system where it can achieve extremely large blocks that follow alongside the path of Moores Law. The concept of Moores Law means every two years technology gets more advanced within the integrated circuit and transistor production environment. Vermorels paper explains that terabyte blocks could work while also being economically sound. Further, the transaction output of a terabyte block could contain around 4 billion Bitcoin Cash transactions, according to Vermorels research. Assuming a worldwide population of 10 billion humans, terabyte blocks offer about 50 transactions per human per day, explains Vermorels paper. 50 transactions per day per human appears sufficient to cover all human-driven activities; and only a healthy machine-to-machine market would require an even greater number of transactions. 1TB Blocks Can Work Using Existing Hardware and Software Vermorel also goes into great detail on how a mining rig could be built to process 1TB blocks by utilizing a combination of existing and proven hardware and software technologies. Moreover, the cost associated with the mining rig is considerably low enough to ensure a healthy decentralized ecosystem, Ve Continue reading >>

How Many Transaction Per Second Is Bitcoin Theoretically Capable Of?

How Many Transaction Per Second Is Bitcoin Theoretically Capable Of?

Answered Dec 18, 2017 Author has 875 answers and 611.5k answer views The Bitcoin may be redesigned and the forks, sibling cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin Cash, are basically redesigns of the Bitcoin but as it is designed now, the Bitcoin network cant handle more than 5 transactions per second on an average day. The algorithms are optimized so that a new block is foumd every 10 minutes in average, see the recently mined blocks at Bitcoin Block Explorer - BTC.com and Bitcoin Block Explorer - Blockchain . Now, as you can see easily, especially through the second hyperlink, the number of transactions per block rarely exceeds 3,000. This is roughly the average in the full blocks. Thats given by the fact that the Bitcoin block can have at most 1 megabyte and the average transaction needs 300500 bytes of data. Even if one takes 3,000 as the (overstated) average, its 3,000 transactions per 600 seconds (10 minutes), and thats simply 5 transactions per second, or some 400,000 transactions per day. (This very number makes it obvious that you couldnt feed 300+ million Americans every day if they were supposed to pay for the food by the Bitcoin. 99.9% would starve to death within days even if the survivors were allowed 1 food per day.) This theoretical limit is basically being saturated these days. Its not clear whether and how the interest in the Bitcoin drops again. But if it doesnt, the Bitcoin has already reached its limits of capacity. Right now, the number of unconfirmed transactions is approaching the May 2017 peak value above 200,000 again. The fees are going up. The most recent biweekly difficulty adjustment took over yesterday and the difficulty was increased by 15% or so relatively to the early December adjustment. That could mean an even lower number of blocks. A payer Continue reading >>

More in ethereum